Book Review of the Killer Angels Essay Example

Book Review of the Killer Angels Paper Between the days of July 1, 1863 and July 4, 1863, the Civil Wars outcome was decided. These four days have been known as the Battle of Gettysburg, the turning point of the war. In The Killer Angels, Michael Shaara brings us a vivid image of what the battle was like. Shaaras work is very impressive. He is able to capture how things were during the Civil War. The fate of the country was resting on that war so the novel adds a great deal to the readers mind. Shaara was able to bring to the reader a little of the war. The book also gives you a feel for some of the important characters of the battle, including Lee, Longstreet, Pickett, Buford, and Hancock. The most inspiring figure in the book, however, is Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. He led the 20th Maine regiment of volunteers who held the Unions left flank on the second day of the battle. The Killer Angels gives us an idea on how war affects people. The characters could have been anyone. The author focuses in on universal em otions, not great figures. For example, everyone has always heard of Grant and Lee because of their importance. But few have heard stories about the common soldier. The book centralizes on the actions of the common soldier, even though it is from the leader;s point o view. Emotion in the story affects even generals. Several times in the book you can see that they feel for those lost in battle. Usually, generals are often portrayed as being larger than life. Shaara adds a human touch to them. One conclusion that could be drawn from the book is that the Confederates quick start had some effect. Outnumbered, the Union forces managed to hold until afternoon when they were overpowered and driven back. In the confusion, thousands of Union soldiers were captured before they could rally on Cemetery Hill.

The Functions of Boldface

The Functions of Boldface The Functions of Boldface The Functions of Boldface By Mark Nichol Boldface type, which has a heavier weight than, meaning it is thicker than, roman type, is employed to provide emphasis but has a prescribed set of uses. This post outlines those uses. In running text- the default wording in a piece of context, as opposed to display copy, which consists of headings, subheadings, captions, footnotes, sidebars, and other special text- boldface is appropriate only in certain circumstances. In printed and online publications, it is most often employed in educational contexts, where newly introduced terms may be bolded, or styled in boldface, to signal to a reader that such terms are key to understanding the topic under discussion. For example, in textbooks, words introduced as new vocabulary are often formatted in boldface within the running text. At the beginning of each chapter or section, these words may be listed in a sidebar, and they may be defined in footnotes or in a glossary, or list of terms and definitions, at the end of the section or the book. In most other cases, using boldface in running text is an aesthetic choice, often for humorous effect or, for example, to represent shouting in a children’s storybook. Display copy is often boldface to distinguish it from the running text, although such content is generally styled in a different font and in larger point sizes for that reason. Run-in subheads or sideheads- those that begin a paragraph or a section of type rather than appear on a line above it, and that are generally formatted the same point size as the rest of the paragraph or section- are often boldfaced to distinguish them from the narrative that follows. (Such subheads are, alternatively, often italicized.) Punctuation following a run-in subhead, whether a period, a colon, or a dash, should also be boldface. And when, for example, glossary terms are boldfaced, if punctuation follows each term before the definitions, the punctuation should be boldfaced. This is also true for figure headings (where, for example, â€Å"Figure 1.† or â€Å"Figure 1:† precedes the title of the figure) and captions, where directional terms such as above or left may be boldfaced or where a run-in heading may precede a caption’s explanatory text. However, in running text, punctuation that follows a boldfaced term, because it is associated with the surrounding text, not with the emphasized element, is not boldfaced. (This is true even if the boldfaced term is enclosed in parentheses or bracketed by a pair of commas or dashes.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Slang Terms for MoneyCapitalization Rules for Names of Historical Periods and MovementsIs "Number" Singular or Plural?

Strategic managment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Strategic managment - Case Study Example veraging them further because the firm was aware that their old ways of coming up with a finished market was over, and that technology needed to be incorporated to come up with a world class product and also market it (Marsh, 1998). The firm was also aware of some of the markets that they could venture into in order to leave a mark. S&M scores on Kay’s three areas by ensuring that their products are long lasting. For instance, in consumer handtool labels, S&M was able to come up with a label that would last for nearly 10 years without wearing out and still have the same effect it would have when it was new (Marsh, 1998). Some of the lessons that can be drawn from this case study are that firms should be willing to accept change in their production and marketing strategies if they want to overcome the stern competition in today’s world. However, the risk of using cheap means of production is that another competitor, one day, might beat them, and consumers might be forced the switch their